Download our Fact Sheet on DSD Activism:  Click here

Fact Sheet on DSD activism

Until recently, people who were born with bodies that were not typical for the standards of what is considered normal for male or female were called intersex.  A group of medical experts and one US organisation, ISNA, decided to change the term from intersex to DSD or “disorders of sex development” without consultation with those who would be directly affected by this terminology and increasing pathologisation of their bodies.  So this controversy is not just about a term but about the consequences that the very diagnosis will have on the lives of intersex people.  Please keep that in mind when reading this fact sheet. 

Fact 1:  Almost all the parties involved in promoting DSD are not intersexed and are not representing the intersexed community. 

The Consensus Group which made the official recommendation to reclassify intersex as a disorder of sex development was a group of over 50 medical experts, not intersexed people.  (1)

ISNA is the only organisation which was represented in the DSD consensus group which decided to change the nomenclature from “intersex” to “disorders of sex development”.  This organisation is not representative of the intersex community.  It has almost no intersex membership and is principally made up of medical specialists and people who are not intersexed.  (2)

Alice Dreger is not intersexed.  She is one of the main activists who speaks for us and who wrote the first article in a medical journal recommending that the term “intersex” be replaced by “disorders of sex development” or DSD.  (3)

Emi Koyama is a multi-issue political activist. She is featured on ISNA's website as if she is condoning this shift. We in OII do not condone asking her about her private medical history, even though ISNA has often wanted medical proof from intersexed individuals in spite of the fact that many people except the very rich cannot afford all the tests required to determine an exact diagnosis and also that many people have intersex variations for which there is no clear explanation at this time.

Eric Vilain is not intersexed but he is willing to speak for us and make statements in the media that the term “intersex” is hurtful. He is also involved in research which could have very tragic consequences for the people he says he is speaking on behalf of.  Why does he ignore the overwhelming majority of intersexed people?  Click here for more information  and Click here also

Fact 2:  DSD activists are making medicalisation and normalisation treatments of intersexed infants more legally and medically justifiable.

By having a medical diagnostic category which combines a group of unrelated “disorders” into an umbrella diagnostic category, DSD activists have made the sex (which is now the disorder) of the infant itself the medical diagnosis. Previously, many intersex variations had their specific diagnosis which made it clear that from a medical point of view these different variations did not have anything in common. 

Fact 3: One of the main motivations for switching from intersex to “DSD” was homophobia and transphobia. 

Emi Koyama has indicated that this was part of the motivation for changing the terminology. Cheryl Chase  has conceded this in her writings.  (4)

Fact 4: The term is stigmatising. 

Alice Dreger herself, one of the principle architects of the new terminology, admitted that DSD was viewed as stigmatising to intersex people.  If one of the main goals of intersex activism is to put an end to shame, then why use it?  (5)

Fact 5:  DSD activists have all the access to the media and deny others any representation when they speak about us. 


You can help the intersex community.  Spread the word about DSD activism and make sure that other people know that even though these parties may say they represent the intersex community by continuing to use the term intersex and calling themselves intersex activists, we in OII feel they should be called DSD activists and if they have a problem with being called DSD activists, then they should state clearly why.



(1) Clinical management of individuals born with intersex conditions has been in a state of flux in recent years. Working groups, comprised of 50 international experts, members of the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society (LWPES) and the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE), convened in Chicago in October 2005 to formulate a consensus document derived from an evidence-based literature review.
(2) See ISNA's Medical Board.  Also note that some of the doctors are also in control of the actual executive board.
(3) “Changing the Nomenclature/Taxonomy for Intersex: A Scientific and Clinical Rationale”, Alice Dreger et al, Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism, 18. (729-733 (2005).
(4) Quote from brochure authored by Cheryl Chase: “Intersex” has been embraced by groups with a variety of social agendas not focused on improving medical care. Whether or not you support these agendas, it’s confusing to label a patient’s medical condition with a label that implies an agenda of radical social change. Some of these include:
• people who want to prove that homosexuality is a normal variation
• people who want to prove that transsexuality is a normal variation
- From “Why change the medical nomenclature?” By Cheryl Chase
(5) We realize, of course, that any terminology including the word “disorder” can be construed as pejorative. We’d also like to emphasize that we use the abbreviated form of DSD whenever possible. Explaining why this is important, Alice Dreger writes, “we find that, when accompanied by an explanation of what we mean, DSD isn’t terribly stigmatizing. And an important point: the acronym DSD is very useful—and thus, the acronym should be favored over the spelled-out term— because as an abbreviation we don’t focus on ‘disorder’.” We explain what we mean, and then use the term “DSDs.” Thus, we recognize that this is not a perfect term, but we hope ISNA’s supporters and allies will understand that it’s helping us enact real change in medical care. – ISNA Website

http://www.isna.org/node/1028
Note: That entry has recently been removed from the ISNA blog page. 































Please share this Fact Sheet with others.  You are free to download this document and send it, post it and use it in presentations as long as it is not modified.  If you wish to change the text, please contact OII.