For more articles by Sophia Siedlberg: Click here

The Fools who would be king for a day.

By Sophia Siedlberg.

© 8 April 2009

Many years ago, back in the days of human sacrifice, people would appease various deities and providence by sacrificing other people to them. One interesting "reward" for whoever was unfortunate (or fortunate depending on your point of view) to end up being sacrificed was to spend a period of time being treated like royalty by being given all the privileges that those planning to do the sacrifice could give.

There is a new "religion" if you like and it is called sexology, and those it sacrifices are people this new religion had previously tormented. These sacrificial lambs for the slaughter suddenly find themselves being given the power to lord it over everyone the sexologists don't like. And these "Kings for a day" do seem to take some very interesting forms. One is a "Republican Muslim she-male prostitute" who is also an expert of quantum mechanics and has the right to decide who gets bullied by those in charge of this new religion. Another is an anesthetist who was subject to dismissal from a clinic after doing genital examinations of a patient under anesthetic. Now she describes herself as an "Autogynephilic Transsexual". There is another who claims to be "the genuine article" when it comes to being intersexed, but the truth is, while this person may have an intersex condition, this is not why the new religion accepts them, they are accepted because their "narrative" (social history) fits with the dogma of this new religion.

They are kings for a day because the new religion tells them what they want to hear, and allows them to express themselves in some very bizarre ways. When a gun toting psychopath is given a gun and told to go and write about killing transsexual people because they are "Perverted" and then told that this makes them sane and reasonable, you have to wonder what is going to happen next.

Well, when the law catches up with some of the cult leaders in this new religion, you can guess who is going to take the rap for all the crimes of this new religion - the sacrificial lambs.

So what is the dogma behind this new religion? Well, it is actually about conforming to certain "norms" and in this new religion there is a distinct hierarchy. At the top of it stands the sexology priesthood, and just below this lies the "Profitable intersexuals" That is intersex people who tow the party line and who didn't make any waves when they were given various treatments. Below this lies the "Homosexual Transsexual" someone who is transsexual but "transitioned early". The reality of this "caste" (if you like) is that they are younger transsexual folks who tow the party line and look good to those sexologists who fancy a bit of slap and tickle. Then there are the "Autogynephilic transsexuals" who are transsexual folks who "transitioned" a little later. They serve a purpose, and in this new religion they are the demons who everyone must avoid being seen as. (Unless of course they preach a gospel of self hatred while fiddling with patients under anesthetic).

Then there are the vile unclean masses who do not conform to this hierarchy but do have an intersex condition or are transsexual. What the new religion does is interesting. For example it will tell someone who is intersex but does not tow the party line they are an "Autogynephilic transsexual". They say this so as to make the individual concerned try to prove they are not "Autogynephilic transsexuals" (Bogeymen) so as to gain "Intersex privilege" (To claim what the religion claims is their "Birthright" that is to "Conform and then be sacrificed"). This "Intersex privilege" is an utter lie, mind you. Intersex people only get privileges if the religion says so, and if they don't have the sort of history the religion is comfortable with, they are sent to the lowest caste within that religion, the Autogynephilic transsexual.

According to this religion, I am a man who was married for probably around 30 or so years. I had a highly paid job, a huge penis, and sired about six children and had a sex change. (The religion will never be able to substantiate this because I am not a man nor was I married for about 30 or so years. I have never had a highly paid job and I have never sired any kids. The only thing that would be true is that I have undergone genital surgery at various times during my life). So why am I someone else? I don't really mind the new religion making these false claims because the moment they publish these definitions will be the moment they end up in court having to prove it, and they will find no wife, kids, or job consistent with male status. They may find some of my blasphemous misadventures, such as the history of violence, but unlike the sacrificial lambs I am honest about all that. I have a few nasty little episodes in my life I am sure the inquisitor general will dredge up. But it may be incriminating for them because some of the places where I was abused as a kid were overseen by the new religion. As were some of the places that made my life hell as an adult.

So according to the religion I am an autogynephilic transsexual. I suppose the next thing I will hear will be that I can be promoted to "Intersex" or "DSD" if I accept the rest of what this new religion says. No way, it is not going to happen, I do not agree with what was tantamount to a social cleansing experiment in the early 90's set up by a California medical insurance firm and a few other parties who had a few less than legal interests.

Let's face it. Who will sound more credible when the truth comes out, a "Republican voting Muslim she-male prostitute" with a history of threatening to kill students at a school, or someone who has just said they oppose the mistreatment of intersex people. If they can produce wife, kids and career, from out of the thin air and claim them to be mine along with having been born with a functionally fertile male anatomy (These are after all the criteria by which they define me, criteria which I understand to be socially acceptable, curious what the new religion thinks of the family then!) Then they might be able to call me an "Autogynephilic transsexual". But they won't because none of these things ever happened (Life might have been easier if they had actually. See how bizarre this new religion actually is).

The sacrificial lambs however are a different matter. I can think of at least one who did have all that, and the others, well they were a bit messed up but they were born a specific sex and have lived accordingly from what I can see). In a backhanded sort of way they would be doing me a favor by calling me an "Autogynephilic transsexual" because in the UK that would mean I could apply for a "Gender recognition certificate' and be legally defined as a female, as opposed to "male". This is because in the UK in order to qualify for a gender recognition certificate, you must not have an intersex history and you most certainly must not have been diagnosed with either Klinefelters Syndrome or 5 alpha reductase deficiency, which UK law states '"Is Male regardless of the physical condition". Why? Well, it is a legal loophole. So yes, if the new religion can furnish me with proof that I am or was a man in every sense, rather than by dint of a legal loophole, and can provide some documentation to prove I was married, had children (And was thus a fertile male) and had only one operation in my 60's (I didn't I am also 45) and had a well paid job, then great, I may not like the criteria or definition that much but then I could at least be legally recognized as female (Ironic huh?).

You see legally I am male in the UK, and to be classed as legally female, I would have to be a transsexual who had lived as unambiguously male with proof to that effect to avoid questions about my intersex status. ("Homosexual transsexuals" are, I am led to believe, checked for an intersex status so it can be ruled out before the GRC is given).

The mad thing is the loophole I am speaking of can be traced back to the new religion. Well there you go!

So let's see what the sacrificial lambs and the sexologists have got to say now. I think they are slipping because, while they like to think calling me an "Autogynephilic transsexual" gets me angry, it doesn't. Being told lies about what happened when I was eighteen moths old and the intention behind it gets me angry and the new religion is certainly trying that. But the means by which they are doing it is going to do nothing more than provide me with the means to gain a female legal status. (Not that I consider that particularly important but for the purposes of my legal rights in the UK, it would help.)

The next time a sacrificial lamb or barking sexologist sends me an email from "Uranautogynephile" I will be happy to provide them with as much of my medical history as I can (They want this you see so they can deny it) and when they have been kind enough to deem me biologically male, I can cave their skulls in and get myself a female GRC because I am basically female. I would cave their skulls in because even though they would be doing me a favor they didn't intend it that way.

The sacrificial lambs however would probably not fare quite as well as I might in the end. I suspect the sexologists are about to realize that they have outlived their usefulness and there will be a few drops of blood on the carpet.

Are you thinking that their current well worn method of intimidation and lies is not working? You will be right. The more they call me nasty things that are male (Including a married man with 6 kids and nice job? Sure the family values brigade don't consider that nasty. Oh who is funding this new religion? Ah the family values brigade, how interesting).

I am hoping that the new religion decides that I am a man who would be queen, because then I would be legally a woman. But as it is, I am glad I am not a king for a day, because I swear, the kings or sacrificial lambs are on a fast track to prison or suicide if they think their sexology masters are going to keep them nice and safe in a brothel to live out their fantasies for the rest of their lives when they "retire", they are living in cloud cuckoo land.

So keep doing what you are doing you wonderful leaders of the sexology cult because your social experiment will clearly have the opposite effect to the one you intended. And your trolls will now be thinking that you are going to turn on them (Which you will, I know you want to) and as I magically become a "Lesbian with more, who was a victim of female circumcision" (Intersex according to the new religion) I have no doubt I will then remain classed as legally "male" such are the strange twists of "Intersex privilege".