Illustration: "The ultimate obscenity Where intersex children are mutilated by this monstrosity so men and women can piss and screw in comfort!"
Pen and Ink: one of a series of 27 From "The non rites of passage of Salmacis" By Sophia Siedlberg
Stonegate Oct 21
By Sophia Siedlberg
Today I have found out that Stonewall were not telling the truth. But before I deal with that specifically, I would like you to look at the artwork above, not because it is "nice", (Actually it isn't very nice at all.) but because when I was a kid most children had nightmares about monsters under the bed. I on the other hand had to face an all too real monster which I called "Gellit", A contraction of Gelal and Lilitu, and it was the monster that butchered me as an 18 month old child. Reader, meet the two sex system as it actually is. Two sex system, meet the reader, who, I have no doubt, you have already taken control of!
There is a reason why this illustration is on this page which will become more evident in a moment.
Please take note of the words "piss" and "screw" because they will become very relevant in a little while. Stonewall claimed that one reason they were giving Julie Bindel the Award for "Journalist of the year" was because she was being a good little girl (How sexist is that?) and she had not written anything nasty about those "Transgenders" (How much of a ghetto is that!) and as such she was eligible. Sadly I have to say that no. This may not be strictly true. She wrote a very interesting article in 2008 called:
In which she says the following:
"Billy Wizz, one of the LGFF organisers, points out that the festival has a commitment to screening films of interest to the transgender community. "One of our priorities is to work with our audiences to ensure we provide events and facilities that they have requested," he says. But why would transgender folk need a "gender-neutral" loo at a gay film festival, when they would ordinarily use the one prescribed to their chosen gender? And why do women never have enough toilets? Think pubs; think Glastonbury."
I would rather be more truthful Julie. Think Surgeon; think intersex child; think norm borns calling that child "Transgender" and think child in pain having nightmares about what is truly depicted in the nice little drawing at the top of this page. I also used to read the Beano as well. Julie continues:
"To make our sanitation system properly gender neutral, women would need to learn how to pee standing up, and men do away with their urinals, always put the seat up, and aim for the basin. But not everyone is convinced. "There are men who would love to see what goes on in the ladies'," says Lamé. "But, trust me, I do not want to see theirs."
Well I tell you what Julie, I prefer to use the piss bag I was as good as born with, with the catheter (Don't kid yourself I will never be able to stand while pissing either). And I will not have to use either the men's toilet and get all the shit because I look more female and have a sort of vagina and get called a "Woman prostitute plying for trade". I would also not have to use the women's toilets and get a lot of shit about having chromosomes that don't fit and being called a "Man with a huge stiffy invading women's space" (How could I get a stiffy never having actually had a penis in the first place?).
Also I would avoid "Transgender toilets" because they would be a token gesture and not good enough, and they would not be good enough because men and women (Such are their privileges given to them by a certain obscene monstrosity) are clearly given the right to walk into those toilets and "Inspect the goods". (Presumably to determine if the regular users are "Pervs" or "Prostitutes"). Not only that, I find the title "Transgender" personally offensive if applied to me, because all that does is deny what was done to me as a kid.
If you are still reading this and can stomach the brutal truth, please take note of how we are all being told (Again) that there are only men and women, and the people saying "Only men and women" really have this obsession with toilets. Some lame (Or Lamé) excuse about "Transgender" and "Gender neutral" toilets does not wash because men and women would be allowed to use them to pass judgment on those "Transgenders".
Well "Transgender" is a bit of a spin really. Because it was invented in the 1950's by a transvestite called "Virginia Prince" who did not like being called a transvestite, and yes Prince was the prime example of what the radical feminists whine about. Prince was a man in a dress. Prince was not a victim of infant genital mutilation. Prince was not intersexed, and Prince was never opposed to infant surgery which is never consented to. However, at the same time she was opposed to transsexual people having surgery (with consent, sought and paid for) themselves because they had "healthy bodies". (What was that supposed to mean? Let me guess. Well, she means that intersex people were "unhealthy". That’s what I would assume) . So to call such a token pissing space a "Transgender toilet" is an insult basically.
Also men and women negotiating about who can piss and where (or screw - such are men and women when their hormones get going) is doubly insulting when you consider that they mutilate kids so they can be let into these pissing spaces and they still hammer such people anyway because the pissing spaces are temples to the monster.
Now what was that Julie Bindel was saying about "deconstructing the gender binary"? Can I have an intersex pissing space where men, women and someone like Virginia Prince are excluded? No! I was born with an "unhealthy body", so I must shut up!
