For a list of articles by Sophia Siedlberg: Click here

The Quacks and Journalists who would be Vivi-sexuals.

Keywords: Transsexual, Transgender, Intersex, J Michael Bailey, Alice Dreger, Clarke/Northwestern, "Grundian" Newspaper, NYT.

By Sophia Siedlberg

24 November 2008

I saw an interesting quote in the UK's "Grundian" Newspaper today.

"These days, the clinic is often visited by transvestites and transsexuals, and people who practise bondage and other sexual fetishes."

This is not uncommon from the "Free thinking" Grundian columnists. This article was about the Portman Clinic where, it would appear, an intersex child belongs in the same category as a child abuser. (Well, according to the Grundian and certain vivisectionists such as the Clarke Northwestern.) Perhaps it is a good idea to clarify what the "Left wing" Grundian Newspaper is about. They are good when it comes to sexual orientation, but when it comes to anything to do with "Gender" then we are talking the Der Eigene Spare Rib School of Body Nazism. There is little or nothing to be gained by trying to debate with them, or even try to make them think. They believe that you are born into a given anatomy and you should be punished accordingly. (Perhaps they need to see a few Portman shrinks themselves).

No, this is about the "Gender" issue, or to be more accurate the "Diagnosis" of "Gender Identity Disorder". It is a bit of a catch 22 that is used to make transsexual folks beg for societal mercy. It sort of works like this. Someone is born anatomically the wrong sex. That is, they cannot function as that sex because for some as of yet undetermined reason, their nervous system simply does not recognize them as that sex.  But, in order to get the appropriate treatment for this distressing situation, they have to go to vivisectionists, and

say, "I am a stinking fetishistic pervert, I deserve to suffer, society hates me, re-arrange my genitals if I agree to be hated even more". As you can see, there is a bit of a problem with this. What the vivisectionists want to hear is perhaps a little different from what the transsexual individual is really suffering.

Another very telling aspect of all this is how most of the literature that imposes a "fetish" on transsexual folks is aimed at people who identify as female and seek treatment to become female. Vivisexuals are phallocrats, as are the "Feminists" who write in the Grundian. Is there any point in challenging this dogma? No! I know that if I sat here and wrote a lengthy article about the BSTc studies, or about genes such as Xq28 or Cyp etc., I would be wasting my time because they will either ignore it or claim I am stupid and don't know what I am talking about.

I think it is better to match them with their own methodology. I would say that Vivisectionists and Grundian Journalists who are "Experts" on this stuff fall into two distinct categories, "SBV" and "FBV". SBVs are "Sadistic Bigoted Vivisexuals" who basically impose lies on "Gender variant" people in order to gain pleasure from tormenting them. I suspect if your average SBV were living in a world where "Gender variance" didn't exist, they would be fiddling with kids. (Well, actually they do already, but that falls outside the remit of this article). FBVs or "Fetishistic Bigoted Vivisexuals" are just stupid. They are the sort of people who would claim if someone lost an arm in a car crash, the sense that an arm is missing by the patient is "A limb fetish" and thus "Sexual".

SBVs tend to be medical experts while FBVs are often journalists. (In the UK's Grundian Newspaper). SBVs are often more "educated" and have many "Doctor Privileges". They are especially suited for pimping, more so than real qualified doctors. FBV's are just stupid. They often take a lot of time climbing social ladders and become "Experts" in various forms of social science. They love to quote mantras such as "Gender is a social construct" and then deny transsexual folks have a "Brain sex" that is opposite to their bodies. They often claim that transsexual folks are fetishing a gender role. (Usually female). Now what marks their stupidity is that in the Grundian you will often find articles supporting "Venus and mars" science that talks of men being good at reading maps and women being good at rearing children (Brain sex basically) which is interesting, considering they are constantly saying: "Gender is a social construct".

Vivi-sexualism is a very disturbing disorder and it is a disorder. What I am saying is no satire but an observation describing the mental disorders those who write things like the DSM and who write in the Grundian suffer from, and of course will not admit exists. I tend to think that transsexual and intersex folks are often used by society to feed the revolting delusions of vivisexuals. Should society screen vivisexuals out of the medical and journalistic professions? I believe they should. I mean Vivisexualsm is a form of child abuse when you consider that vivisexuals love to fiddle with and carve up the genitalia of intersex children, and some vivisexuals really like to "Test drive" transsexual research subjects. (This is why some SBVs are especially suited for professions such as pimping and spamming.)

But how can you identify someone suffering from "FVD" (Fetishistic Vivisexual Disorder". SBV's are easy to spot. They often write by asking dumb questions such as, "Is it a boy or a girl. This is the painful question faced by doctors and parents with new born intersex children." Another symptom is the way they treat transsexual folks. "There is a sociologic, biologic issue with the trans person that requires a lot of brutality to treat." You will notice that they like to use truncated words (Kellogisms) such as "Sociologic" as opposed to "Sociological", in order to give their writings an air of authority. What makes an SBV stand out however is the rampant sadism that underlies both their writings and actions. It is not uncommon for SBV's to defend each other using a sadistic sort of "Buddy" system where one will write defamatory things about transsexual folks, and when the transsexual folks object to it, the other will appear "studying" the objections as "Sexual disorders". It is a classic example of a "Study the squeals of lab rats" complex. Another would be when the first SBV is openly sexually abusing and raping transsexual teenagers. The second will have their own sexual partner claim that their own sexual activity often forms a part of "Research".

FBV’s are a little harder to spot. But you only have to look in certain newspapers to find them. (The Grundian in the UK or America's NYT are good places to look). And again there are written hallmarks. Perhaps the best known is the listing of various unpleasant sexual activities and slipping "Gender variance" in with them. The quotation used at the beginning of this article is a good example. Here is another: "Sadomasochists, child abusers, serial killers, rapists, new born intersex babies etc." You will notice how "New born intersex baby" get slipped in, with the idea of associating such babies with criminal or scary behavior.

Often an FBV will pretend to be in a state of despair. "It is so confusing and the boundaries are blurred," they will say, while blurring the boundaries between an innocent child and scary sexual practices. "We need to take a firm moral stance," they will say, while hiding their own obvious immorality. Vivi-sexuals are in truth criminals who pretend they are not. This is why they work so hard to cultivate an image of respectability, playing on people's prejudices in order to give weight to their own vile fetishes and delusions. FBV’s have another habit, and that is adding a hyphen. To illustrate this I have placed a few examples of "Vivisexual" with the hyphen. "Vivi-sexual" in this text. If this stood out, you probably sensed I hold vivi-sexuals in utter disgust. FBV’s do it more often. (Usually with every occurrence with a given word with the hyphen and ending of "Sexual".) A few examples would be "Trans-sexual" and "Inter-sexual" the purpose of this is to convey a sense of disgust, as if they are holding what they are discussing at arm's length saying "Trans, ugh, disgusting, sexual" with the hyphen substituting "Ugh, disgusting".

Another hallmark of both types of vivisexual is the use of key phrases like "Gender Confusion" and "Gender confused". Also they groom victims often by writing a text that starts off looking supportive of their victim's plight:

"Eddie was a victim of an unfortunate condition, of allegedly being a woman trapped in a man's body. This terrible affliction often affects <insert convenient statistic> so many people we need to treat the gender confused with care and compassion."

However, vivisexuals use this as a means to "sting" their victims, that is those who read the first lines and feel as if what they are reading is safe to read, lulling them into a false sense of security, but often such narratives end with:

"We need to look at these perverts and make them suffer.  We do this for their own good so they accept that they are vile, disgusting, repugnant freaks who deserve to be stamped on, hahaha!"

Vivisexuals also seem to display a sort of chromosexual comorbidity. (Again this is not satire; I mean it). They often cite: "Girls have an XX chromosomes and boys an XY." The more ignorant using "Chromosome" in the singular rather than the plural "Chromosomes". I am not sure whether this constitutes a Kellogism, but it is quite probable that the singular "Chromosome" is a Kellogism and should be taken to be a

warning sign that the writer is a very dangerous type of  vivisexual.

Vivisexuals often play "blame the victim" as do other sexual abusers, such as rapists or child abusers. (This commonality between vivi-sexuals and other sex offenders is real, not invented.) It is fair to say that vivisexuals are worse than other types of abusers because they use "Blame the victim" to gain victims. Most abusers when grooming their victims are doing so because they know what they are doing is wrong. Vivisexuals blame their potential victims so those caring for their victims are conned into allowing the abuse.

Conclusion:

There is perhaps very little that can be done to make vivisexualism a criminal offence. The only thing I can do is point out the fact that vivisexualism is a sexual disorder in the proper sense, with predatory behavior and people with this disorder often abusing their victims and leaving their victims permanently scarred mentally and physically. It differs from bigotry because vivisexualism is sexually motivated. A vivisexualist can be described as a sexual abuser trapped in a sexual abuser's body. There is hope however, as vivisexuals will never be brought to account for their crimes because society likes them. Even when they abuse children, society still likes them. It is possible that someone will find a genetic marker and perhaps say to potential parents that the child may be carrying genes for vivisexualism. I think that rather than finding "Gay genes" and "Transsexual Genes" with a view to eliminating those people, it would be better to isolate vivisexual genes, and when that happens, paradoxically, you will be rid of evils like eugenics. Sort of like using controlled fires to make fire breaks to prevent larger forest fires.